The market is growing for paid virtualization technologies although it still represents a minor portion of the entire server marketplace – hovering around 10% according to Microsoft. What is new is that virtual machine (VM) server technology is now available and more attractive to small business users for four reasons:
• Free versions are becoming more capable.
• Prices are coming down on paid versions or support for free versions
• Ease of setup and management is growing.
• The technology can help reduce power and cooling requirements just as being green is gaining attraction to more.
Keep in mind Virtual servers are just one part of the entire virtualization market, which is growing to include storage virtualization all the way virtual desktops.
But in the past year, four trends are obvious:
1) Growth of the hypervisor: The hypervisor is now found in more places, both exploited in the latest processor chips from Intel’s Virtualization Technology vPro and AMD-V, and as a standard package with most of the popular Linux distributions and soon for Solaris too. The hypervisors, or virtual machine control programs, for the three major vendors (Microsoft, Citrix and VMware) now support this embedded hardware, which makes for simplified installation and nearly one-button booting of virtual servers.
2) Interoperability: Interoperability has taken chief cause, and we have seen in the past year a series of initiatives to make managing multiple VM vendors easier. VMware announced several management tools that enable automation of the entire lifecycle of a VM, including staging the migration from a development/test environment into production, according to Bogomil Balkansky, the Senior Director of Product Marketing for the company. “Our customers tend to want to do more with virtual servers once they get it into their shops.”
Another dimension to the interoperability story is a standards effort called the open VM format. “With this format, organizations can use a standard set of VM management metadata to manage VMs running on different hypervisors.
“While work remains, the eventual goal of these standards is to provide hypervisor interoperability, such as by taking a VM image built on the Microsoft Hyper-V hypervisor and running it on a Citrix XenServer hypervisor without having to modify the VM’s configuration.”
3) Falling Prices: Prices are coming down and functionality for even the free versions is improving. The free products – and indeed, all of Microsoft’s virtual server line – continue to be a great way for enterprises to become familiar with VM technology and to do any evaluations before deploying them into production.
On the paid products, XenServer continues to be the lower-priced spread, offering single-CPU versions and better value when compared to VMware. The latter’s prices are now almost comprehendible, an improvement from their obscure complexity of last year. VMware also introduced support for 10 gigabit Ethernet networks and larger memory and disk support with its latest version, and now has more than 700 pre-built virtual “appliances” or virtual disk images.
4) Widening Channels: The virtual server channel continues to widen, with more partnerships, agreements, and expertise. As smaller, specialty companies enter this market, they are looking to cement relationships, expand distribution, and make just about every component in the data center virtualized.
table.virtual { font-size: 11px; font-family: Verdana, Helvetica; margin: 10px; }
Table: Virtual Server product comparison
|
VMware |
Microsoft |
Xen |
| Product URL |
Vmware.com |
Microsoft.com/virtual server |
Xensource.com |
| Free server product |
VMware Server |
Virtual Server 2005 R2, HyperV Win Server 2008 64 bit |
XenServer Express, (Enterprise 30 day eval.) |
| Paid server products |
Infrstructure v3.5 (Starter, Standard, and Enterprise) |
None |
XenServer Standard, Enterprise, and Platinum Editions |
| Pricing range paid product |
$1640 for two CPUs, includes 1 yr. support contract |
Free or included in Windows Server 2008 (64 bit) |
$600 – $5000 plus support contract |
| Host OS (if any) |
Server: Windows Server 2003, various Linux Infra v3: bare metal |
Windows Server 2003 R2, 2008; XP Pro SP2 or Vista for testing purposes only |
Bare metal |
| Management tools |
Lifecycle Manager, VMotion, Storage Vmotion |
System Center VM Manager |
XenCenter Management Console |
| Embedded hypervisor product |
ESXi supports both AMD and Intel chipsets |
None* |
Yes |
| Advantages |
- Over 700 pre-built appliances
- Widest selection of guest OS support
- Wizards galore for install aids
|
- Can run on any IE browser with Internet access
- Less expensive option
- Easy cloning of VM images
- Familiar UI
|
- Open source solution that doesn’t require any host OS
- Lower cost
|
| Disadvantages |
Confusing array of pricing and configuration options (2 CPU minimum pricing) |
Limited pre-built VHD appliances and just of MS server products |
- Limited Windows guest OS support
|
*Microsoft’s offering does not have an embedded hypervisor, it does recognize and take advantage of computers with either the AMD or Intel virtualization.
Viertualization is a growing trend in the market and will continue in the years to come.